to the letter from me Kerstin Gröbmüller, in today's issue, I would say one thing.
published in this letter can be found people again, I mentioned that never in my letter.
But another was removed ...
I am of the opinion that if an editorial it Letters to the editor considers necessary to change, it must be first against the author read and approved.
Once again mention the name of our chemical experts in the newspaper, although this was explicitly clear that he does not want it is a violation of personal rights!
I will not again send the Friedberger General a letter, or say anything because I want to avoid are reproduced once more wrong.
I will no longer be a subscriber of this paper explains, is self
And why is our press release on the event information is not published?
you like to Page 4 of today's edition of "Access to file was granted" we want to briefly explain something.
Yes, it reads beautifully.
incurred but the impression we had with the statement that we still have not received full access to the file, not satisfied of the truth.
Our lawyer was in fact on 27.01.2010 in the LRA Aichach and stated there what he needs from the file. Accordingly, it was agreed that copies be made and they are delivered. Usually this happens in a period of about 2 days.
In our case, our lawyer took the Act after 8 days of itself.
is usually served with the Act following the request. The
Request comes shortly after filing suit. The
you can not edit a file in the LRA, but this is by the law firm should be clear.
0 comments:
Post a Comment